Re: Lexical byte-compilation warnings cleanup

[Stefan Monnier]

> Excuse me for not following the thread and perhaps not understanding what
> you say here.  Are you saying that if `lexical-binding' is non-nil then
> a function parameter whose name is the same as a dynamically scoped
> variable is "not allowed" or does not refer to that variable?

Indeed, it does not refer to the dynamically bound variable.

> That would be counter to how Common Lisp works, and I thought (and I hope)
> that our aim was (is) to use the way Common Lisp marries lexical and
> dynamic binding as our model.

Elisp is not Common-Lisp.


        Stefan