[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r113589: Merge: Add vc-ignore.
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r113589: Merge: Add vc-ignore. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:10:30 +0800 |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Xue Fuqiao writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Stefan Monnier
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >> + (cvs-append-to-ignore): Moved from pcvs.el.
> > >
> > > Please use the present tense in ChangeLog entries.
> >
> > So, what should it be? Is "Moving from pcvs.el" appropriate? My
> > grammar isn't very good.
>
> "Move here from pcvs.el." would be good.
>
> "Moving" is the "present participle", not the present tense. The idea
> is to use the simple present tense to describe the change (not what
> was lacking) and to indicate what the developer was thinking when he
> executed the change. If this is done consistently, there's no
> confusion between undesirable (pre-change) states and corrected
> states. Native speakers often use past tense to describe the buggy
> state: "Emacs crashed when user did X", with "change Y fixes this"
> implied. But it's hard (for a native speaker) to write "Emacs crashes
> ..." when it's already fixed. So the discipline of use present tense
> tends to implicitly enforce the discipline of describing the change,
> not the bug.
Fixed, thanks. Maybe it can be added to standards.texi.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/