Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?))

[Nic Ferrier]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>         [ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
>         [ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
>         [ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
>
>     Ok. But all my namespace proposal is, is basically this, with automatic
>     'load-read-alias'. 
>
> The virtue of my proposal is that it does not change the meaning of
> symbols, obarrays, or any built-in functions.  It has no effect on any
> file that doesn't use it, so it can't break anything, and if you don't
> choose to use this facility, you don't need to know about it.

I don't think there's anything in my proposal that causes any of those
effects either.

I am aiming for absolutely the same thing you are.

This is why I have been saying that those asking for a CommonLisp
namespace system should look to someone other than me to build it.



Nic