Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?))

[Nic Ferrier]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> I disagree. Emacs isn't CommonLisp, never has been CommonLisp and
>> very likely, never will be CommonLisp.
>
> Agreed, but all else being equal, it's better to do the same as
> Common-Lisp (or as Scheme) than to invent our own.

But they aren't equal.

I have looked at CL's system and Scheme's. I'll try and add a summary to
the blog post and also describe how it differs from CL and Scheme.