Re: Small improvements to ruby-mode

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 13.07.2013 14:23, Bozhidar Batsov wrote:
> Great! Btw, shouldn't we highlight the conversion methods from Kernel
> (Float, Integer, etc) as built-ins?

Sure, it's now easier to do correctly. Done. :)

>     But there's really nothing that would distinguish a Math::E
>     reference from Foo::C. Or from GC, IO, DL, IRB, URI, XML, HTML, etc.
>
>
> Yep, I'm aware we can't distinguish all cases without the use of a
> proper parser, but I guess we should handle accordingly at least the
> scenarios which are deterministic.

But we have to highlight these abbreviation-named modules *somehow*. And 
we're bound to be wrong in 50% of these cases. That's why I don't think 
it's a good idea.

That difference in highlighting wouldn't convey much information anyway: 
uppercase text with underscores is easy to notice as it is.