Re: Interface of prog-prettification

[Stefan Monnier]

> now.  I think (as already suggested here) that an arbitrary string
> should also be supported.

I'd wait until a concrete use case comes up for it, tho.

JB> - I don't fully understand how the user is supposed to extend the
JB> default modes' prog-prettification. What is the expected interface?

There is no interface for it.

> The assumption is that if you like to prettify lambdas as symbols, you
> won't mind it everywhere.

Oh, I hadn't noticed you made prog-prettify-symbols into a defcustom.
I think that's a mistake.


        Stefan