[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2013 10:18:27 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 00:47:50 +0400
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> The patch doesn't seem to have the desired effect (and I've tried make
> clean && make CFLAGS="-g3").
>
> Moreover, despite the above CFLAGS value, I'm unable to obtain detailed
> backtrace here:
>
> Breakpoint 3, 0x74c98e76 in msvcrt!abort ()
> from C:\windows\syswow64\msvcrt.dll
> (gdb) bt full
> #0 0x74c98e76 in msvcrt!abort () from C:\windows\syswow64\msvcrt.dll
> No symbol table info available.
> #1 0x6e956f62 in libgcc_s_dw2-1!__deregister_frame_info_bases ()
> from J:\Apps\System\MinGW\bin\libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll
> No symbol table info available.
> #2 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
>
> Lisp Backtrace:
> "kill-emacs" (0x88f028)
> "save-buffers-kill-emacs" (0x88f318)
> "save-buffers-kill-terminal" (0x88f644)
> "call-interactively" (0x88f880)
> "command-execute" (0x88fb7c)
> (gdb)
>
> If I revert the patch, recompile and reproduce it again, 'bt full'
> outputs it full, no problem.
Sorry, I don't follow. Are you saying that there's still a crash
after applying the patch, except that you cannot get a backtrace when
the crash happens? What exactly happens when you try to produce a
backtrace? Are you sure you switch to the correct thread when asking
for a backtrace? Try "info threads" and "thread apply all bt".
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, (continued)
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/05/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/18