[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:15:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> My way (of course :-). The main idea is to move this out of
> configure.ac, because the full power and high cost of Autoconf
> isn't needed here.
This has never been a consideration in my mind when converting things
from old-school Emacs build-style to autoconf. There's probably tons of
stuff that falls into the above category. I have never considered the
speed of configure an issue. Why is MS Windows any different to eg AIX,
unixware, or any of the other platforms that almost no-one uses but
configure.ac handles? I don't know how many people will end up using
configure on MS Windows, but if it is > 1 it probably still beats AIX...
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, (continued)
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/16
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/18
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/18
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Dani Moncayo, 2013/04/18