[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?
From: |
Thorsten Jolitz |
Subject: |
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:04:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> But the lisp convention is the opposite:
>
> Right, that's because Lisp didn't think it through.
> Luckily, we're only dealing with Elisp,
So what is the official Elisp convention then:
,------------------------
| ;;; * level 1
| ;;;; ** level 2
| ;;;;; *** level 3
`------------------------
or
,-------------------------
| ;;;;; * level 1
| ;;;; ** level 2
| ;;; *** level 3
`-------------------------
?
--
cheers,
Thorsten
- Re: Naming internal functions, (continued)
- Re: Naming internal functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, xfq, 2013/04/15
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/08
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Leo Liu, 2013/04/09
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Barry OReilly, 2013/04/09