|
From: | Jose E. Marchesi |
Subject: | Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: | Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:30:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>The point is, I am trying to determine whether Bzr is effectively >maintained or not. I'd rather get a Yes answer than a No answer. Given that Bazaar is GPL v2 and the contributor agreement is not that onerous IMHO (e.g. you retain copyright to your contributed changes), what's stopping the user community from stepping up to help to maintain it, just like any other free software? Not that onerous? The Canonical Individual Contributor License Agreement requires you to explicitly authorise Canonical to license the contributed software under a proprietary license. See section 2.3 of the agreement. -- Jose E. Marchesi http://www.jemarch.net GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |