Re: Eshell and Sudo

[Aidan Gauland]

Michael Albinus <address@hidden> writes:
> Aidan Gauland <address@hidden> writes:
>> Thanks for coming to the rescue.  The changes look fine, except for the
>> `require' in a defun.  Is that a good idea?  (Not a rhetorical question;
>> I don't know, I just haven't seen this before.)
>
> Look at eshell :-) There are other defuns which apply the same trick.
>
> I would like to avoid this, but I run out of ideas why Tramp loads
> itself recursively in this special situation.

OK, then I'd say go ahead and commit the changes.  I hope this clears up
the recursive load problem.  Any idea why this appears erratically (for
some people and not others)?  Have you been able to reproduce it
consistently?

Regards,
Aidan Gauland