[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:51:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Bastien wrote:
> is it possible to get a formal authorization from the FSF to
> dual-license the Org manual with both GNU GPLv3 and GNU FDL 1.3?
>
> Sebastien (cc) is maintaining the Org package for Debian and he
> needs upstream version of Org manuals to be dual-licensed so that
> Debian can distribute the Org manual under GNU GPL.
Already asked and answered by rms
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-06/msg00990.html
We do not need a solution because we don't have a problem.
Debian has a problem, and the solution for that is to change their
policy.
Please do not make this change; it goes against our licensing
policies.
Irresistible force, immovable object, etc.
> I see MH-E* is dual-licensing the manual so I expect this must
> be somehow accepted.
True this is anomalous. rms has previously commented on this too
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-06/msg00989.html
Later Bill Wohler reminded rms off-list that it had previously been
agreed (in some previous private discussion IIUC) for mh-e that dual
licensing was ok, so it stands.
- Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/13
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15