[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bzr Emacs question
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: Bzr Emacs question |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:49:32 -0800 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:22:28 -0800
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > >> From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> > >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:47:31 -0800
> > >>
> > >> > A tag is not a revision-id by itself. Try
> > >> >
> > >> > bzr up -r tag:mh-e-8.3.1
> > >>
> > >> Not surprisingly, that produces the same error.
> > >
> > > I guess I don't understand what your "bzr tag" command did. What is
> > > "emacs-24.1" in that command?
> >
> > I want the mh-e-8.3.1 tag to correspond to the Emacs 24.1 release. I had
> > assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that the emacs-24.1 tag was what I wanted.
>
> In what branch did you issue that "bzr tag" command?
trunk.
I also tried creating a branch of emacs-24, but got the same error
there.
> > >> > (And I'm not sure you really want "up" and not some other command, but
> > >> > that's another story.)
> > >>
> > >> What would you recommend as an alternative to "svn up -r<revision>"?
> > >
> > > I don't know, I never used SVN seriously. What did you want to
> > > accomplish?
> >
> > I want to grab the MH-E files associated with the Emacs 24.1 release in
> > order to make an MH-E 8.3.1 release.
>
> If you want to update the tree to a certain revision, I think
> "bzr revert" is a better choice, because "update" will leave any
> uncommitted changes you might have.
OK, thanks!
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Re: Bzr Emacs question, Bill Wohler, 2012/11/24
Re: Bzr Emacs question, Bill Wohler, 2012/11/24