[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:41 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
David Engster wrote:
> Additionally, I've also regenerated the Elisp parsers from the updated
> grammar files. This converted some more explicit copyright ranges like
>
> Copyright (C) 2002-2004, 2007, 2010-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc
>
> to a simple range like this
>
> Copyright (C) 2002-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Is this acceptable?
If the former is the true statement, that the latter is not an
acceptable alternative, no. If the former was for some reason incorrect
and the latter is correct, then obviously it is ok.
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Notices
- Feature freeze on October 1, Chong Yidong, 2012/09/15
- Re: Feature freeze on October 1, Daniel Colascione, 2012/09/16
- Re: Feature freeze on October 1, David Engster, 2012/09/16
- Re: Feature freeze on October 1, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/16
- Re: Feature freeze on October 1, David Engster, 2012/09/16
- CEDET merge (was: Feature freeze on October 1), David Engster, 2012/09/26
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/09/30
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/09/30
- Re: CEDET merge,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: CEDET merge, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/30
- Re: CEDET merge, Glenn Morris, 2012/09/30
- Re: CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2012/09/30
Re: Feature freeze on October 1, Bastien, 2012/09/16
Re: Feature freeze on October 1, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/17