Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> I think the problem is to get emacs-lisp-mode to understand it.
>> Indeed, CL reader macros are a problem for editors.
> [...examples of complex situations...]
>
> I do not think the benefits justify such complexity at this point.

Specifically, it would only target one user class of emacs: the Common
Lisp programmers.  The problem is that if CL programmers eventually fork
to their own clone of emacs, a lot of them won't be programming emacs
lisp anymore.  This would not necessarily be a better situation.

Moreover, notice that it hints to a general solution to the multi-mode
problem.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.