Re: Are ELPA files "part of GNU Emacs"?

[Bastien]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Each of these files should say what package it is part of.
>
> Clearly that package is not GNU Emacs.  The package is not ELPA
> either, because ELPA is not a package.  

Okay.

> Each file is part of some
> specific named package (AUCTeX, for example) and should say so.

Some files are standalone libraries, they are not part of a package
containing several files.  It would be weird to say they are part of
themselve.  I suggest these files just say nothing.

When I am confident all GNU ELPA package maintainers are notified
when a modification is done in their files through bzr, I will go
through the files and fix a few misleading statements.

-- 
 Bastien