|
From: | Christophe Poncy |
Subject: | Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr |
Date: | Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:17:42 +0200 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4 |
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:40:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Bastien <address@hidden>Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hiddenDate: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:29:13 +0200 Regular Org testers don't want to rebuild Emacs each time they have to test a new feature in Org.Why would they need to do that? Org is not preloaded into Emacs, so all you need is compile the new Org files and perhaps restart the Emacs session, but not rebuild Emacs.
It's so easy and convenient to get their latest development release from their git repo. I must confess that I like this way to stay up to date. I would love to do the same with emacs ;)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |