[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:45:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, AJMR
>> <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:04 +0100
>>
>> > Maybe I'm too naive but if x is unsigned, I don't expect to
>> > see -x . The implicit semantics for unsigned is x >= 0.
>>
>> -x is well defined for any value of unsigned integer type.
>
> Perhaps so, but using that obfuscates the code, so it's undesirable if
> it can be avoided.
There is no obfuscation. This is the only way to make it work
correctly.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Andreas Schwab, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/03/23
Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/22
Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/03/27