[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:08:37 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
On 02/29/2012 10:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I agree that such confusing code, even if it does its job correctly,
> is bad for maintainability.
This particular code is fairly clear when you look
at the code's context (and it's also clear that there's no bug
that the patch would fix). Any patch that adds a comment should
take that context into account. Also, since this code is imported
from gnulib the patch should be sent to bug-gnulib.
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/24
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, AJMR, 2012/02/26
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/26
- Re: Windows 64 port, AJMR, 2012/02/27
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28