[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs revision #107149
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs revision #107149 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:03:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
>> As far as I can tell from the cc-mode code, `c-font-lock-fontify-region'
>> unconditionally calls `c-standard-font-lock-fontify-region-function'.
>> Furthermore, `c-standard-font-lock-fontify-region-function' doesn't seem
>> to be set to anything other than `(default-value
>> 'font-lock-fontify-region-function)'. And the variable is not a
>> user-level variable, which seems to make the entire tap-dance routine
>> here rather ... odd.
>
>> Why not just call `(default-value 'font-lock-fontify-region-function)'
>> unconditionally?
>
> It's unclean programming, and won't work properly under XEmacs.
You may well be right, but looking at the code, I don't really see why.
There's one single consumer of
`c-standard-font-lock-fontify-region-function'? There's one single
place it's set? If it isn't set, the function breaks unconditionally?
Or is it set to something else under XEmacs (in code that's not in the
Emacs 24 tree)?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, (continued)
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/12
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/20
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/21