[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:25:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:19:44 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
LI> As previously discussed (like, a year ago), the prompting sequence when
LI> sending bug reports, especially from "emacs -Q", was kinda
LI> unsatisfactory. (The main point was that it required that you had a
LI> valid-ish From header, even though you might end up sending the message
LI> through mailclient.el, which will then just rewrite your From header,
LI> anyway.)
LI> Fixing this required a bit of refactoring of the sendmail.el/Message
LI> setup functions, but hopefully I didn't screw up anything too badly.
LI> And the prompting sequence looks OK to me now, but please let me know if
LI> anything is wonky.
I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST
or whatever) call. That would cover the most users and we can use
confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming.
Ted
- `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Jason Rumney, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/11
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Chong Yidong, 2012/02/14
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Dimitri Fontaine, 2012/02/19
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/21