Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Eric Schulte]

Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:42, Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Given that cl inclusion suddenly seems possible, I would like to say
>> that from the perspective of working on Org-mode the availability of cl
>> functions would be a great help.  We already have at least the following
>> Org-specific re-writes of existing cl-functions, and we frequently have
>> to cull other cl functions from the code base.
>>
>> org-count
>> org-find-if
>> org-reduce
>> org-remove-if
>> org-remove-if-not
>
> I must be misremembering. Isn't it ok to use the cl functions here?
> (You would be using it in compiled code.)
>

You are misremembering.  If it were ok org, gnus, ert and widget would
not all have their own remove-if variants?

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/