[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CL package serious deficiencies
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: CL package serious deficiencies |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:29:41 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:23, Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman spake thusly:
>
>
> So as a result, if one of us wants to use `cadr' in ordinary Lisp
> functions that are part of Emacs, we can, but if we want to use `caddr',
> we can't. Now does that restriction make any sense at all? I'd say it
I am using caddr quite a lot. Without any whining byte-compiler or
other problems... ;-)
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, (continued)
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Glenn Morris, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Daniel Colascione, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Tom Tromey, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Leo, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Tom Tromey, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/09