[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:36:57 -0500 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:16:26 -0500
>
> I think, to get this working, we need a list of critical ELPA packages
> that Emacs will check for updates on startup and alert the user to
> upgrade. By default that list should be empty on all platforms, except
> on W32 it will contain the "gnutls-w32" package.
Again, why are we treating MS-Windows specially? Why shouldn't Emacs
issue the same alert on GNU and Unix systems, if GnuTLS is found to be
unavailable? The fact that several distributions have Emacs depend on
GnuTLS does not mean all of them do or will, and let's not forget that
even in the year 2012 users can build their own Emacs (without GnuTLS).
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Daniel Colascione, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Richard Riley, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/06