[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: immediate strings
|
From: |
Dmitry Antipov |
|
Subject: |
Re: immediate strings |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:30:05 +0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 11/26/2011 12:05 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Does the proposed implementation arbitrary restrict
string length to be 1/2 of their current limit?
I assume this could be fixed somehow, without too
much trouble.
IIUC, string length can't be larger than most positive Lisp integer,
which is smaller than BITS_PER_EMACS_INT - 1 size bitfield anyway.
Dmitry
- immediate strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2011/11/25
- Re: immediate strings, Andreas Schwab, 2011/11/26
- Re: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/26
- Re: immediate strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/26
- Re: immediate strings,
Dmitry Antipov <=
- Re: immediate strings, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/26
- --with-wide-int, Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/27
- Re: --with-wide-int, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/11/28
- Re: --with-wide-int, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/29