[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Your changes in revision 106240
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Your changes in revision 106240 |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:23:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
On 10/30/11 00:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It is unreasonable to ask GDB to display a list
> that is longer than a small number of items.
First, list display need not be involved. For example:
set $len = Flength (which_symbols (Qnil, $my_limit))
pp $len
These GDB commands print a count of how many symbols have
the value nil, while not bothering to count any symbols more than
an upper bound of $my_limit. On a 64-bit host, there's no good
reason for these commands to misbehave merely because $my_limit
exceeds 2**32.
Second, even if display is involved, it is sometimes reasonable to
ask for the display of a long list. For example, when debugging
Emacs under GDB, I sometimes generate long outputs which I then
analyze with other tools.
- Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/29
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/29
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/31
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/30