[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:13:45 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:20:09 +0100 Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
N> (The most confusing thing in Emacs is the inverted naming of
N> scroll-{up,down}-command with respect to the modern meanings of
N> 'scroll up/down', but that is probably not changeable without
N> breaking the world at this late date.)
"Modern"? Mac OS X Lion has reversed up and down scrolling[1], showing
us Emacs was right all along! :)
Ted
[1] yes, it's because of the touch interface, but still...
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Ulrich Mueller, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/29