[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:48:16 +0900 |
Tim Cross writes:
> One question I do have - what happens if you do have a keyboard that
> is setup to have both meta and alt (as well as super and hypa) and you
> want to do a real alt binding using one of these keys?
Most PC-based systems do define Alt as well as Meta, but good luck
using them if you have a desktop installed: the desktops typically
grab a couple dozen for their own use, leaving Meta free for the
programs. Also, accessibility features often use Alt to access the
menus (XEmacs does this). So I would say "binding Alt is not
something that Emacs devs should worry about, although users are
welcome to do it themselves".
As for what happens, I believe translations happen at a lower level
(ie, earlier in the event-processing pipeline) than binding, so to use
those Alt-KEY combinations you would need to disable their
translations as well as bind the keys.
- Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/26
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27