[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:47:15 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
martin rudalics wrote:
> Confusion of operation and state based reasoning. People adopting the
> latter were surprised that a horizontal split would produce a vertical
> divider (among them ISTR Glenn Morris, Miles Bader and some people on
> help-gnu-emacs).
Yes; for example I would call them split-window-about-vertical-axis and
split-window-about-horizontal-axis, which are "opposite" to the
traditional names.
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Ulrich Mueller, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/29