[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:09:39 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 16:58, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I agree. The doc is more important than the command names.
> If the doc is clear then users can understand easily.
I doubt that it is about understanding. Rather remembering ... ;-)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Lennart Borgman <=
RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Dave Abrahams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Ulrich Mueller, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26