[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
Evil Boris |
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:38:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> Martin recently introduced the command names
>
> split-window-above-each-other -> C-x 2
> split-window-side-by-side -> C-x 3
>
> for which split-window-{vertically|horizontally} are now aliases.
>
> I don't mind the attempt to address the vertical/horizontal ambiguity,
> but the new names aren't ungrammatical. In English, "split X above each
> other" sounds like a nonsense phrase, and "split X side by side" isn't
> much better.
>
> How about split-window-by-width or split-window-by-height? Or can
> someone suggest something better?
How about split-window-into-left-right and split-window-into-top-bottom?
or ... -left-and-right and -top-and-bottom ... ?
I suppose split-the-current-window-into-a-left-window-and-a-right-window
would be a bit wordy.
--B
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/26