[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries
From: |
Christoph Scholtes |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:06:30 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> I didn't realize the above crash was with your binaries. If it was,
> it's probably a different problem. Leo, if you have a way of
> reproducing this, please run under GDB and produce a backtrace, or
> better yet, show the recipe (and file a bug report).
I looked around in the tdm bug tracker but I couldn't find any issues
related to optimization or `-fno-omit-frame-pointer' reported for 4.6.1
so far.
>> Just to make sure, is specifying `--no-opt' enough to disable
>> optimizations when configuring or do I have to specify `-O0'
>> explicitely?
>
> Specifying --no-opt is enough.
>
> With --no-opt, -fno-omit-frame-pointer should have no effect, because
> this optimization is turned on by -O1.
Thanks.
- emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/24
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Leo, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/25
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries,
Christoph Scholtes <=
- Re: emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111024-r106182 Windows Binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26