[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: smtp crap
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: smtp crap |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:38:17 -0700 |
> I assume that asking them to "first edit them in Emacs, then edit them
> in their MUA" is worse than to just edit them in their MUA.
No, that's a bad, unwarranted assumption.
Some users might choose that, but it's important that users still be able to
edit a bug report using Emacs, and then just paste it into their mail client.
My non-Emacs mail client has lots of features that I take advantage of, but for
plain-text editing Emacs is far better. There is no reason to force users to
choose to either use Emacs for everything from editing to sending mail or use
their mail client for everything.
- Re: smtp crap, (continued)
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Tim Cross, 2011/10/09
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/11