Re: No sources for lisp/international/uni-*.el?

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2011, Richard Stallman wrote:

>     Could somebody please explain how this issue is different from
>     the recent one with the CEDET grammar files?

> According to my not totally reliable memory, we concluded that both
> forms of these files were equally valid as the "source code",
> because they were equally handy for making any changes.

Hm, for example lisp/international/uni-name.el doesn't look like "the
preferred form of the work for making modifications to it". The file
rather has the appearence of line noise. ;-)