[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory leak due to bidi?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Memory leak due to bidi? |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:15:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I've no idea - I get similar performance from the command line. trying
>> to use VC annotate on the file within emacs was taking forever - I
>> didn't find out how long as I was too impatient to wait for it.
> You should report this to the bzr guys. They do care about
> peformance, specifically performance on Windows. bzr is not going
> away any time soon, so you may as well do what you can to help get
> this fixed.
IIUC what Andy is saying is that the problem is in vc-annotate and not
in Bzr itself. It is true that vc-annotate is fairly slow (and the same
holds for grep and compilation output).
Stefan
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, (continued)
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Andy Moreton, 2011/08/04
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/03
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/08/04
- Re: Memory leak due to bidi?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/08/04