[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiled files without sources????
From: |
Evgeny M. Zubok |
Subject: |
Re: Compiled files without sources???? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:56:30 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> There are multiple archives called "ELPA" and I am not sure which one
> you mean. If it is the GNU one, we definitely must add the
> documentation source. If it is another, we cannot tell those people
> what to do with code that isn't copyright FSF. But we won't refer the
> users to any archive that fails to follow thus rule.
Yes, I meant the GNU ELPA and the packages `muse' and `auctex'.
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, (continued)
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Tim Cross, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Chong Yidong, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Chong Yidong, 2011/07/31
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Evgeny M. Zubok, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, David Kastrup, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????,
Evgeny M. Zubok <=
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, David Kastrup, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Chong Yidong, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/31