Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
>     address@hidden,
>     address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:44:50 +0900
> 
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
> Now you are the one being disrespectful.

Didn't mean to be, granted.  Sorry if my choice of words somehow could
be interpreted otherwise.

>  > The point is that certainty of success should be quite high as a
>  > prerequisite for approving such significant features for a merge.
> 
> Certainty is not "high" or nor even "quite high".  Certainty is an
> absolute, no differences from expectation allowed.

Sorry for not choosing the right word, English is not my first
language.  I guess I meant high probability.