Re: [emacs-w3m:11603] Re: interactive-p obsolete

[Lennart Borgman]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 13:38, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> FWIW, I agree with Juanma here: compatibility functions should live
> where they are needed, i.e. in external packages.

For larger well maintained packages that is no big problem. However
for small packages/single elisp files it is worse. (We might have an
example here where the compatibility function is in error and needs to
be replaced.)