[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting ChangeLogs
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: splitting ChangeLogs |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:10:25 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> I think I see the light now. You are saying that with "bzr cp",
> the DAG will still be (almost) the same, except that "bzr diff" and
> other commands will simply act _as_if_ the new ChangeLog had the
> same history as the old one. Right?
Yes. Although I wouldn't use "as if" to describe an equivalence like
this. For all practical purposes, it really does have the same
history.
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, (continued)
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Message not availableRe: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06