Re: post-command-hook

[Johan Bockgård]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> (defun foo ()
>>   (message "foo"))
>> (defun bar ()
>>   (message "bar"))
>> (add-hook 'post-command-hook 'foo)
>> (add-hook 'post-command-hook 'bar nil t)
>
> I think the patch below fixes it,
>

>  safe_run_hooks_1 (void)
>  {
>    eassert (CONSP (Vinhibit_quit));
> -  return call0 (XCDR (Vinhibit_quit));
> +  call0 (XCDR (Vinhibit_quit));
> +  return Qnil;
>  }

Shouldn't the "return nil" be in safe_run_hook_funcall instead?