emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A better autogen.sh


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: A better autogen.sh
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:37:32 -0400

> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:23:09 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> On 03/16/2011 01:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The trouble is, we keep requiring newer versions of autoconf from time
> > to time, and later more frequently than in the past.  Experience shows
> > that upgrading autoconf on fencepost involves asking GNU sysadmins to
> > do that, which takes a non-trivial amount of time and sometimes
> > repeated pinging.
> 
> That may have been a problem in the past, but it's not a problem now,
> because fencepost's /usr/bin/autoconf is Autoconf 2.65, which
> is good enough for Emacs.
> 
> In the long run I don't expect this to be a major issue,
> but if I'm wrong, I can volunteer to keep
> good-enough versions of automake and autoconf installed on
> fencepost, under ~eggert/bin say, and that will be enough to
> get it to work.

Thanks, but I don't think it is practical to make the maintenance of
non-Posix platform depend on people who are not interested in Emacs
running on those platforms.

Could you please instead tell if new and modified #define's in
config.in can be detected by grepping certain files for AC_DEFINE or
similar directives, and which files to grep?

If it is possible to specify which files to grep for what patterns,
that would open a way for a practical maintenance routine of config.in
outside the main directories of the Emacs tree, and we could then put
this issue to rest (until the next time, which will doubtlessly come).



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]