[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:02:55 -0500 |
Noone suggested otherwise. What we're discussing here is to let the
user type M-x foo RET and have it do something useful rather than signal
that `foo' is not a command (e.g. run `bar-foo', or run `bar' if it
is listed as a mode-local alias).
So this would be a secondary method of lookup, used only if there is
no such symbol? I wouldn't object to that. (I didn't see that stated
explicitly).
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org
- Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/06
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/09
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Davis Herring, 2011/03/09
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Richard Stallman, 2011/03/10
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11