Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions

[Lennart Borgman]

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> That comes back to my earlier suggestion of "inheriting" from constant
> (uncustomizable) "faces".

That is totally out of the question for me.

Take for example a vision impaired person who want to customize a face
to make it more readable. Then inheritance is very important. Without
it s/he would have an enormous job to customize all relevant faces.