[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:27:50 +0900 |
Miles Bader writes:
> My impression is that in general, ImageMagick does not aim at memory
> efficiency (that's why I don't want to use its libraries for my own
> image I/O needs, event though doing so would be pretty convenient).
> I would have though it's OK for small/medium images though.
I believe disagreement on this point was a (minor) reason why the
GraphicsMagick project forked off. Anyway, GraphicsMagick *does* aim
at efficiency, both in time and space. For that reason it's been my
primary target in speculation about adding such support to XEmacs.
- Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Tassilo Horn, 2011/01/06
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, joakim, 2011/01/06
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Jashy, 2011/01/06
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Miles Bader, 2011/01/06
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Tassilo Horn, 2011/01/07
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Andreas Schwab, 2011/01/07
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Tassilo Horn, 2011/01/10
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Jashy, 2011/01/10
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Tassilo Horn, 2011/01/10
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Jashy, 2011/01/10
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, Jashy, 2011/01/11
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, joakim, 2011/01/11
- Re: Using the ImageMagick backend seems to leak memory, joakim, 2011/01/11