[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr vs. git repository
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bzr vs. git repository |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:36:08 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:14:42 +0100
>
> > (A great surprise was "annotate", which, for xdisp.c, took 1
> > minute with bzr, but a whopping 4.5 minutes with git. But I see
> > that as a curiosity.)
>
> That is not a curiosity but a consequence of git's design choices.
Yes, I understand that (and thanks for the details). I meant
"curiosity" as in "not really representative for comparison purposes".
Sorry for unfortunate choice of words.
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/01
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/01
Re: bzr vs. git repository, Richard Stallman, 2011/01/01