[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strange generate-new-buffer-name behaviour
From: |
Ken Raeburn |
Subject: |
Re: strange generate-new-buffer-name behaviour |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:06:30 -0500 |
On Dec 11, 2010, at 14:26, Alin Soare wrote:
> I discovered an error while reading the info page for generating a name for
> an unexisting buffer :
>
> In 27.3 Buffer Names I see written so:
>
> (generate-new-buffer-name "foo")
> => "foo<5>"
> (generate-new-buffer-name "foo" "foo<3>")
> => "foo<3>"
> (generate-new-buffer-name "foo" "foo<6>")
> => "foo<5>"
>
> However, for me all these forms evaluate to "foo"
This might be obvious, but: Do you actually have existing buffers named "foo",
"foo<2>", "foo<3>", and "foo<4>" as described in the paragraph before that
example code?
Ken