Re: Fwd: How to remove verbosity from the data passing mechanism using alist or plist ?

[Fren Zeee]

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> There was no reply from the help mailing list and this is very
>
> That's because the question is completely incomprehensible.  When you
> ask a question, always assume your readers are dimwits, and explain
> every detail of what you're trying to do, rather than just spitting what
> you're doing and assume people will understand.
>
>
>        Stefan
>

flame bait ignored :))))

The question is VERY CLEAR !!! and SPECIFIC at the LAST STAGE !!!

==============================================================
OK lets take the suggestion below and show me how it works with my case ?


> You need the ‘car’ because you do ‘(list k v)’.
> If you use ‘(cons k v)’, then you do not need the ‘car’.


What I have is

(list (list k1 v1) (list k2 v2))

Now, kindly show me where I put the car to get both of these uniformly
communicated outside of the function to another function ? Later in
some cases I may have (k3 v3) pair !!!


==============================================================