[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:56:34 +0900 |
Drew Adams writes:
> Unless I'm missing something you are echoing what I said:
Sorry 'bout that. Most of what you write is worth reading, but even
so I run out of time. :-)
> "Shipping" seems to have disappeared from the discussion, so I suppose my
> guess
> that we don't do any shipping was also accurate.
I know GNU does some shipping, I've seen the discs, but whether it's a
real factor for Emacs somebody else would have to answer.
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, (continued)
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Jason Rumney, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/23
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/24
- Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Sean Sieger, 2010/11/25
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2010/11/23
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/23
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2010/11/24
- RE: emacs-20101122 windows binaries,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=