emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:52:36 +0200

> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:28:33 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100
> >> Cc: Sean Sieger <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> >>
> >> >>  - Releases should or should not include debug info?
> >> >
> >> > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info.
> >>
> >> Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without debug 
> >> info?
> >
> > Because it's pointless.  If we want to give users release binaries
> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period.
> 
> Please explain why you think that.

I just did, above.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]