[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time string format
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Time string format |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:39:38 +0200 |
> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:36:47 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
> http://www.iso.org/iso/date_and_time_format
These explain that the ISO format resolves the ambiguity in numerical
specifications of dates. Therefore, it's irrelevant to the issue in
this thread, which is how to display non-numerical dates. There's no
ambiguity in "20 Nov 2010". Not to mention that the date format
discussed here is specific to a locale's language, whereas the ISO
format is agnostic to the locale.
- Re: Time string format, (continued)
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/19
- Re: Time string format, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/19
- Re: Time string format, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/19
- Re: Time string format, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/20
- Re: Time string format, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/21
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/21
- Re: Time string format, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/21
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/21
- Re: Time string format, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/21
- Re: Time string format, Lennart Borgman, 2010/11/22
- Re: Time string format, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2010/11/21